Posted in Dento-alveolar

Exodontia : Basic Principles & Methods

EXODONTIA: Basic Principles & Methods

  1. Pain and Anxiety control:
  • Removal of a tooth requires profound local anesthesia to prevent pain during extraction, and control of patient anxiety is necessary to prevent psychological distress.
  • Local anaesthesia must be absolutely profound to prevent and eliminate painful sensations from the pulp, periodontal ligament and buccal and lingual soft tissues.


  • For obtaining profound anaesthesia of the tooth to be extracted, it is essential for the surgeon to remember the precise innervation of all teeth and their surrounding soft tissue and the techniques necessary to anaesthetize those nerves totally.
  • It is necessary to remember that in areas of nerve transition. There is almost always overlap in some areas. Therefore, it may be necessary to supplement the primary block with additional infiltration to prevent pain from the transitional nerve endings from the surrounding tissue area.
  • Profound local anesthesia results in loss of all pain, temperature and touch sensations but does not anaesthesize the proprioceptive fibres of the involved nerves. Thus, the patient feels a sense of pressure, especially when the force is internal. One must therefore remember to that the patient will need to distinguish between the sharp pain and the dull, although intense, feel of pressure.
  • Inspite of profound anaesthesia, the patient may continue to have sharp pain as the tooth is luxated. This is especially likely when the teeth have pulpitis or the surrounding soft and hard tissue is inflamed or infected. A technique that should be employed in such situations is the PDL injection. When this injection is delivered properly, there is immediate profound local anesthesia in almost all situations. The anesthesia is short lined, so the surgical procedures should be one that can be accomplished in 15 to 20 minutes.
  • It is important to keep in mind the pharmacology of the various local anaesthetic solution that are used, so that they can be employed properly. Following points should be remembered.
    1. Amount of time they can be expected to provide profound anaesthesia (Ref. Table 7.3).
    2. Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary teeth after local infiltration lasts a much shorter time than does pulpal anesthesia for mandibular teeth after block anaesthesia.
    3. Pulpal anesthesia disappears 60 to 90 mts before soft tissue anesthesia does.
  • Maximum dose that can be given safely for the particular anaesthetic agent in use (Ref Table 7.4). It is wise to remember that the smallest amount of local anesthetic solution between sufficient to provide profound anaesthesia is the proper and safe amount.


  • Management of patient anxiety must be a major consideration when one performs oral surgery procedures.
  • Anxiety lessens the pain threshold, and frequently patients are already in pain and may be agitated and fatigued. This lessens the patients ability to deal with pain and pain related situations.
  • Also, as noted before, although local anesthesia eliminates, sharp pain, the dull sense of pressure is still present, which may be come quite intense.
  • For all of these reasons, it is prudent for a dentist to use a prospective planned method of anxiety control to prepare themselves and their patients for the anxiety a/w tooth extraction and oral surgical procedures.

Various methods of anxiety control:

  • Proper explanation of the planned procedure, including assurance that there will be no sharp pain but honest acceptance that there will be dull discomfort due to pressure.
  • An expression of concern, caring and empathy is required of the dentist. For the mildly anxious patient, with a caring dentist, no pharmacologic assistance is required.
  • For the more anxious patient it becomes necessary to employ pharmacologic assistance. Preop orally administered drugs, such as diazepam or chloral hydrate may provide a patient with rest the night before the surgery and some relief of anxiety in the morning.
  • However, orally administered drugs are usually not profound enough to control moderate to severe anxiety once the patient enters the operative suite.
  • Sedation by Nitrous Oxide gas and oxygen is frequently the technique of choice and may be the sole technique needed for many patient who have mild to moderate anxiety. If the dentist is skilled in the use of nitrous oxide gas and the patient requires a routine, uncomplicated surgical procedure, sedation is frequently sufficient.
  • An extremely anxious patient who is to have several uncomplicated extractions may require parenteral sedation, usually by IV route. It may be necessary to administer IV sedation with diazepam or other drugs to aid such patient in tolerating the surgical procedure.
  1. Presurgical Medical Assessment:

When evaluating a patient preop it is critical that the surgeon examine the patients medical status. Patients may have a variety of maladies that require treatment modification before the surgery can be performed safely. Special measures may be needed to control bleeding, prevent, infection and prevent worsening of the patients preexisting state or condition.

  1. Indications for Removal of teeth:

Although it is the position of dental practice to take all possible measures to preserve and maintain teeth in the oral cavity, it is sometimes necessary to remove some of them for various reasons. The following are some such reasons.

  1. Severe caries : When a tooth is so severely caried that it cannot be restored, it frequently is necessary to remove it.
  2. Pulpal necrosis : Second rationale is the presence of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis that is not amenable to endodontics. This may be caused by a patient who refuses to or cannot afford endodontic treatment or it may be caused by a root canal that is tortous, calcified and untreatable by standard endodontic technique. Also included is the endodontic failure.
  3. Severe periodontal disease : A common reason for tooth removal is severe and extensive periodontal disease. If severe adult periodontitis has existed for some time, there is excessive tooth mobility due to irreversible bone loss leading to pain and loss of function. There may also be formation of a periodontal abscess. In these situations, the hypermobile teeth should be extracted.
  4. Orthodontic reasons: Patients about to undergo orthodontic correction of crowded dentition frequently require the extraction of teeth to provide space for tooth alignment. Most commonly extracted teeth are the maxillary and mandibular first premolars, but second premolars or a mandibular incisor may occasionally need extraction for this same reason.
  5. Malopposed teeth: Teeth that are malopposed or malposed may require extraction if they traumatize soft tissues and cannot be repositioned by orthodontic treatment. A common example is the maxillary 3rd molar which erupts in buccoversion and causes ulceration and soft tissue trauma in the check. Another example is hypererupted teeth due to loss of antagonist tooth. These may interface with construction of an adequate prosthesis. Such teeth may need to be extracted.
  6. Cracked teeth: A clear but uncommon indication for extraction of teeth is when a tooth is cracked or has a fracture root. The cracked tooth can be painful and is unmanageable by a more conservative technique. Even endodontic and complex restorative procedures cannot relieve the pain of a cracked teeth.
  7. Preprosthetic extraction: Teeth occasionally interface with the design and proper placement of prosthetic appliances full dentures, partial dentures or fixed partial dentures. In such cases preprosthetic extractions may be necessary.
  8. Impacted teeth: These should always be considered for extraction. If it is clear that an impacted teeth is unable to erupt into a functional occlusion because of inadequate space, interference from an adjacent teeth or some other reason, it should be scheduled for surgical removal unless contraindicated.
  9. Supernumerary teeth: Supernumerary teeth are usually impacted and should be removed. They may interface with eruption of succedaneous teeth and have the potential for causing their resorption and displacement. They are also frequently involved with cyst formation.
  10. Teeth a/w pathologic lesions: Teeth a/w lesions like tumors and cysts frequently require extraction unless they can be retained and endodontic treatment performed. However, if maintaining the teeth compromises the surgical removal of the lesion, it should be extracted.
  11. Preradiation therapy: Patients who are to receive radiation therapy for a variety of oral tumors should have serious consideration given to removing teeth in the line of radiation prior to therapy.
  12. Teeth involved in jaw fractures: Patients who sustain fractures of the mandible or the alveolar process occasionally need to have teeth removed. In majority of situations the involved teeth may be retained but if the teeth is injured or severely luxated, it may need extraction.
  13. Esthetics: Severely stained, malposed or protruding teeth may sometimes require extraction.


These are relative and not absolute, many times extraction can still be done with use of additional care, modified techniques and resolution of underlying problem that contraindicate extraction. Two groups: Systemic and Local.

Systemic contraindications:

In these situations the patients general health is such that it cannot withstand surgical treatment as the condition may be further aggravated.

  • Metabolic diseases – e.g. Severe uncontrolled diabetes, end-stage renal disease with severe uremia. Patients with mild or well controlled diabetes can be treated as reasonably normal patients.
  • Uncontrolled leukomias and lymphomas: extraction may lead to infection due to non-functional white cells and profound bleeding due to deficient platelets.
  • Cardiac disorders: Severe myocardial ischaemic such as unstable angina and patients with recent MI should not have a tooth extracted. Patients with severe malignant hypertension should also have extraction deferred due to risk of persistent bleeding, acute myocardial insufficiency and cerebrovascular accidents.
  • Pregnancy: Patients in first and 3rd trimester should have extraction deferred as much as possible. Latter part of 1st trimester and 1st month of 3rd trimester are just as safe as 2nd trimester and extractions can be carried out if necessary, but more extensive surgical procedures should be deferred until after delivery.
  • Severe bleeding diathesis: Coagulopathy should be corrected by transfusion of coagulation factors and / or platelets. Close coordination with patients hematologist is needed.

Local Contraindications:

  1. Therapeutic radiation for cancer: Extraction in irradiated areas may lead to osteoradionecrosis and therefore must be done with extreme caution.
  2. Teeth located in an area of a malignant tumor should not be extracted – it would lead to dissemination of cells and thereby hasten metastatic process.
  3. Patients who have severe pericoronitis around an impacted 3rd molar should not have extraction until the pericoronitis has been treated. Non surgical treatment with irrigations, antibiotics and removal of maxillary 3rd molar to relieve impingement on the edematous pericoronal tissues will lead to resolution of the infection. Otherwise extraction would lead to severe infection which is potentially fatal.
  4. Acute dentoalveolar abscess: Normally the most rapid resolution of an infection secondary to pulpnecrosis is observed when the teeth is removed as soon as possible. Therefore, acute infection should not be a contraindication to extraction. However, it may be difficult to extract such a tooth because the patient may not be able to open his/her mouth sufficiently wide or it may be difficult to obtain adequate local anesthesia due to increased pH. With resolution of acute symptoms, extraction can be done.

Mechanical principles involved in Exodontia:

Removal of teeth from the alveolar process employs the use of several mechanical principles and simple machines: The lever, the wedge and the wheel and axle.

  • Elevators are used primarily as levers. A lever is a mechanism for transmitting a modest force with the mechanical advantage of a long lever arm and a short effector arm into a small movement against resistance. When an elevator is used for teeth extraction, a purchase point can be made on the tooth and a straight or crane pick elevator can be used to elevate the tooth or root from the socket using the alveolar bone as a fulcrum. The mesial cervical junction of the tooth can also be used as a purchase point and a small straight elevator can luxate the tooth.
  • Secondly, a wedge can be used in several different ways. First, the beaks of extraction forceps are usually narrow at their tips. When the forceps are held, they should be forced into the PDL space to expand the bone and displace the tooth out of the socket. The wedge is also useful when a straight elevator is used to luxate a tooth from its socket by forcing it into the PDL space.
  • The 3rd machine used is the wheel and axle which is most commonly identified the Cryer’s and Winter’s cross-bar elevator. When one root of a multirotated tooth is left in the alveolar process, Cryer’s elevator can be positioned in the socket and turned. The handle then serves as the axle and tip acts as the wheel and engages and elevates the root from the socket.

Principles of forceps use:

Goals of forceps use are 2 fold:

  1. Expansion of the bony socket.
  2. Removal of teeth from the socket.

There are 5 major motions that the forceps can apply to luxate and mobilize the tooth by expanding the bony socket.

  1. Apical pressure: Results in a minimal movement of the tooth in an apical direction and expansion of the tooth socket by the insertion of the beaks into the PDL space. Secondly, apical pressure with resultant bony expansion pushes the centre of rotation more apically which results in a greater expansion of the socket at the alveolar crest region when the forceps is moved. This prevents fracture of apical segment of the root and more ideal expansion of the socket.
  2. Buccal motion: Results in expansion of the buccal plate, particularly at the crest of the ridge. It is important to remember that this also lends to apical pressure and must not be excess or fracture will occur. Maxillary buccal bone is usually thinner and the palatal bone thicker, thus maxillary teeth are removed primarily by buccal pressure.
  3. Lingual motion : Similar to buccal motion but in lingual direction aimed at expanding the lingual crestal bone. Mandibular molars have thick buccal bone and thin lingual bone. Thus they are removed primarily by lingual force.
  4. Rotational motion: Rotates the tooth which causes some internal expansion of the bone. Teeth with single cervical roots like maxillary incisor and mandibular premolars are most amenable to luxation by this method.
  5. Tractional forces: Useful for delivering the teeth from the socket once adequate bony expansion is achieved.

Procedure for closed extraction:

An erupted root can be extracted in 2 major ways: closed or open.

Closed technique is also called as simple or forceps technique. The closed technique is the most commonly used one and given primary consideration for almost every extraction. The open technique is used when there is reason to believe that excessive force would be required or when substantial portion of the crown is missing and access to the root is difficult. For the tooth to be removed from the bony socket, it is necessary to expand the alveolar bony walls to allow the tooth/ root an unimpeded pathway and it is necessary to tear the periodontal fibres that hold the tooth in the bony socket. The use of elevators and forceps as levers and wedges can accomplish these objectives.

Five general steps in closed extraction procedure:

  1. Loosening of soft tissue attachment from the tooth:

This is done using the sharp end of a molts No. 9 or Woodson’s elevator. The purpose is two fold:

  1. Allow surgeon to assure both themselves and the patient that profound LA is achieved. Small amount of pressure will be felt but not a sensation of sharpness or discomfort.
  2. To allow the tooth extraction forceps to be positioned more apically without interference from or impingement on the soft tissue of the gingiva.

If a straight elevator is used to luxate the tooth, the mesial papilla is detached using the sharp end of the Woodson’s molts elevator, which allows the elevator to be placed directly onto the alveolar bone without crushing and injuring the papilla.

  1. Luxation of tooth with a dental elevator:

Usually a straight elevator is used. Expansion and dilatation of the alveolar bone and tearing of the periodontal ligaments ensure that the tooth be luxated in several different ways. The straight elevator is inserted perpendicular to the tooth into the interdental space and then turned so that the inferior portion of the blade rests on the alveolar bone and the superior portion of the blade is on the root of the tooth being extracted. With thumb pressure resting on the mesial tooth, strong, slow, forceful turning of the handle is done to move the tooth in a posterior direction, which results in tissue expansion of the alveolar bone. In some instances, the elevator can be turned in the opposite direction and more vertical displacement of the tooth will be achieved.

  1. Adaptation of the forceps to the tooth:

The proper forceps are then chosen for the tooth to be extracted. Beaks should be shaped to adapt anatomically to the teeth apical to the cervical line, on the root surface. Atleast a 2 point if not complete surface contact should be achieved. The forceps are then seated onto the tooth so that the tips of the forceps beaks grasp the root underneath the soft tissues. The lingual beak is usually seated first, then the buccal beak. Once the beaks have been positioned, the surgeon grasps the handles of the forceps at the very end to maximize mechanical advantage and control.

The beaks of the forceps must be held parallel to the long axis of the tooth so that forces generated by the application of the pressure are delivered along the long axis for maximal effectiveness in dilating and expanding alveolar bone. If beaks are not parallel, fracture of tooth / root may occur. The forceps are then forced apically as far as possible. This accomplishes 2 things. First, the beaks of the forceps act as wedge and expand crestal alveolar bone. Secondly, the centre of rotation is displaced towards the apex of the tooth with resultant increased effectiveness of bone expansion. At this point the surgeons hand should be grasping the forceps firmly, with the wrist locked and arm held against the body, the surgeon should be prepared to apply force with the shoulder and upper arm without any wrist pressure. He or she should be standing straight with the feet comfortably apart.

  1. Luxation of the tooth with the forceps:

The surgeon begins to luxate by using the motions described earlier. As the alveolar bone begins to expand, the forceps are reseated apically with a strong, deliberate motion; which causes additional expansion of the alveolar bone. Buccal and lingual pressure continue to expand the socket and for some teeth rotational motions are then used to help expand the tooth socket and tear the PDL attachment. The forces applied should be slow, firm and deliberate and not jenky. It must be remembered that teeth are not pulled from the socket but rather gently lifted from the socket once the alveolar process is sufficiently expanded.

  1. Removal of tooth from socket:

Once the alveolar bone has expanded sufficiently, a slight tractional force, usually directed bucco-occlusally is used. These should be minimal and result in removal of the tooth from the socket.

Role of opposite hand:

The opposite hand plays an active role in the procedure. It is responsible for reflecting the soft tissues of the cheeks, lips and tongue to provide adequate visualization. It helps to protect other teeth from the forceps. It helps to stabilize the patients jaw during the extraction. It is often necessary to apply significant pressure to expand heavy mandibular bone and such forces can cause discomfort and even injury to the TMJ unless they are counteracted by a steady support of the mandible. Finally, the opp hand supports the alveolar process and provides tactile information to the operator concerning the expansion of the alveolar process during luxation and tooth extraction.

Post extraction care of the socket:

Socket should be debrided if necessary. If there is a periapical lesion visible on the radiographs, the periapical regions should be carefully curetted to remove the granuloma or cyst. Any debris in the socket like calculus, bone or root fragments etc. should be gently removed with a curette or suction tip. However vigorous and excess curettage of the socket produces unnecessary injury and may delay healing. The expanded cortical plates should be compressed with gentle pressure, which prevents bony undercuts from forming and improves healing. Excess granulation tissue if present is removed, bony margins are trimmed and a moistened gauze pack is placed so that when the patient bites his teeth together, it fits into the space previously occupied by the crown of the tooth. This pressure results in haemostasis and should be kept for half an hour.

Odontectomy and tooth division:

Odontectomy is the surgical removal of a tooth or teeth by the reflection of an adequate mucoperiosteal flap, removal of an overlying bone and also bone between the buccal roots of molars by means of chisels, burs and / or rongeurs. After the removal of bone, in many cases, tooth division is indicated. In tooth division, one or many roots are separated from the crown by cross-cut fissure burs or the crown is completely separated from the roots and the roots are then cut apart. This is followed by application of elevators or forceps for the extraction of the crown and then the roots.

The advantage of odontectomy are: the reduction in the number and incidence of fracture crowns or roots during extraction, less danger of oro-antral fistulation or injuring neuro-vascular bundles, less possibility of fracture of mandibular or maxillary and less incidence of tearing out large areas of cortical and cancellous bone with the tooth during extraction.

Indications for odontectomy and tooth division:

  1. Hypercementosis of rests.
  2. Widely divergent roots.
  3. Locked roots – where the roots curve towards each other and touch or nearly touch such that a portion of bone is locked between the roots.
  4. Teeth with dilacerated root tips.
  5. Teeth with post crowns.
  6. Extensively decayed teeth, particularly with those with deep gingival cavities.
  7. RCT treated teeth.
  8. When a thick, dense buccal or labial cortical plate or multinodular exostasis is present on the maxilla or mandible.
  9. When a low antral floor dips between the buccal and lingual roots of the maxillary molars.
  10. When the maxillary alveolar tuberosity is hollowed out by extension of the antral cavity.
  11. Thin mandible with bone, standing teeth which excess forces will be required – fracture of mandible.
  12. Malposed, impacted, unerupted supernumerary teeth.
  13. When the forceps pressure that was used so great that dislocation of the condyles has occurred.
  14. Ankylosed roots.
  15. Variant root pattern that will lead to fracture of roots during normal forceps procedure.
  16. Where the customary force fails to produce any luxate.


Posted in Dento-alveolar

Oroantral Fistula



A fistula ( ‘Latin’ = a pipe or tube ) is an abnormal communication between the lumen or surface of one organ and the lumen or surface of another or between vessels. Most fistulas connect epithelial lined surfaces. Fistulas may be congenital or acquired.

Oroantral fistula ( OAF ) is a relatively uncommon complication of maxillary molar extraction. Other causes of perforation into sinus include destruction of a portion of the sinus following facial bone fractures, periapical lesions, removal of large cystic cavity that encroach on sinus cavity and in cleft patients. OAF occur as a result of failure in healing of Oroantral communication ( OAC ). Although most acute OAC heal spontaneously or after minor surgical procedures, some do persist and result in an OAF following failure in primary healing.

Anatomical & Embyologic considerations

The proximity of maxillary sinus to the dentition of upper jaw makes it highly susceptible to development of Oroantral communication. The floor of the maxillary sinus (formed by the junction of the anterior and lateral sinus wall) in adults is approximately 1 to 1.25 cm below the level of the floor of the nasal cavity. It sometimes encompasses the alveolar process and the roots of molars and premolars. These projection into the antrum are sometimes not covered by bone but only by mucoperiosteum. The distance between the apices of the teeth and the floor of the maxillary antrum varies depending on the amount of intervening bone.

In children and young teenagers whose maxillary sinus has not reached the adult size, the floor of the sinus is at a considerable distance from the apices of the maxillary teeth. So creating an OAC or accidental dislodgement of root tips into the maxillary sinus is unlikely in younger individuals. In older persons, the distance between the roots of teeth and maxillary sinus is only very minimal or root projects into the sinus. The root of maxillary second molar is closest followed by first molar, third molar, second premolar, first premolar and canine.

Developmentally, maxillary sinus is the first paranasal sinus to develop at 3rd month of intrauterine life. Prenataly it has two phases, primary and secondary pneumatisation phases. In primary pneumatisation the sinus cavity lies in the nasal capsule. In secondary pneumatisation phase the sinus grows into the maxilla. At birth the sinus is 7mm Anteroposteriorly, 4mm in height and 4mm in width, with a volume of 6 to 8 ml. Postnataly the sinus grows at approximately 2mm vertically and 3mm anteroposteriorly. It has got three growth spurts birth to 2.5 yrs, 7.5 yrs to 10 yrs and 12 yrs to 14 yrs. At 15 to 20 yrs the volume of sinus is abut 15 to 20 ml.


The incidence of residual OAF following OAC due to tooth extraction is small due to marked healing ability of alveolar bone. OAF generally occurs when there is

  1. Infection in the antrum
  2. Defect is larger than 5mm in diameter
  3. The gingival tissues are not approximated
  4. Wound dehiscence
  5. Patient does not follow post operative instructions.
  6. Large surgical defect following removal of a cyst or neoplasm that encroaches on the sinus.

There is male predominance of  2 : 1 with a peak age distribution in the third and fourth decades because the sinus tends to be larger and the alveolar bone is denser in men.

The predisposing factors for Oroantral communication are

  1. The relationship of unerupted teeth or roots to maxillary Removal of submerged premolars or molars have high chance for Oroantral communication.
  2. Abnormality in size and shape of tooth roots. Hypercementosis of roots, bulbous roots result in difficult extraction and can result in Oroantral communication.
  3. Extraction of lone long standing maxillary molars where the maxillary sinus has grown into the alveolus.
  4. Nature of supporting bone. Sclerosed bone result in difficult extraction and may result in Oroantal communication.
  5. Loss of periapical bone due to periapical granuloma or cyst.
  6. Surgical procedures for removal of large cyst or tumours that encroach upon the sinus.
  7. Iatrogenic causes include incorrect use of dental elevators.

Pathogenesis and clinical features.

An Oroantral communication/penetration will often heal spontaneously and hardly they become chronic fistulas. Factors affecting healing of Oroantral fistula are

  1. Thickness of supporting bone – it should be adequate between the sinus and the mouth, so that the socket is of sufficient depth for fibrous repair to take place in the socket.
  2. Size of the bony defect – Smaller defects heal better. Defects of more than 5mm in diameter will usually result in formation of fistula.
  3. Wound approximation – If the gingival tissues are not approximated or when there is wound dehiscence, there is increased chance for communication.
  4. Presence of infection in and around the socket.
  5. Raised air pressure in the antral or oral cavity. This disrupts the formed clot.

If the Oroantral communication is unrecognised, untreated or spontaneous closure does not occur then it results in chronic fistula. Contamination of the antrum with infected oral fluids and food debris leads inevitably to chronic sinusitis.

The signs and symptoms of are varied depending on the size of the fistulous opening and infection

In small residual defects (pin hole defects) the consequences are slight and symptoms arise only when there is upper respiratory tract infection. The mucopurulent phase is more marked on the narrow side of the fistula leading to a purulent maxillary sinusitis which persists when all other signs of illness subsides.

Fistulas of intermediate size tend to be a source of recurrent (infection) irritant / symptoms. It is usually associated with intermittent episodes of pain and local tenderness along with a chronic, foul tasting discharge. Drainage may be obstructed by an oedematous lining or by polyps which can prolapse through the fistula into the mouth. The polyps might be large and are lined by stratified squamous epithelium which might be mistaken for granuloma.

Conversely with very large defects, there is free drainage, even though there is reflux of food, drink and saliva. Occlusion of the opening with denture or plate might prevent the entry of food particles into the antrum. Retention of full denture is adversely affected due to lack of seal.


The first clue to the occurrence of a fistula is likely to be recognised by the presence of antral floor attached to the extracted tooth. The presence of thin, smooth curved plate of bone is characteristic.

When patient blows with occluded nostril in case of OAC it results in bubbling of blood in the socket. Blood trickling from the nostril of the extracted side also confirms the presence of an OAC.

It is better to avoid use of suction or probing the OAC as it might dislodge the established clot and carry the risk of infection into the wound.

If a fistula is formed during the course of extraction of a root then a characteristic hollow sound is produced when suction is used due to an echo from the sinus.

Radiographic features

Periapical, oblique occlusal or rotational tomographic radiographs will demonstrate the defect in the bony floor of the antrum. These are not essential unless fractured fragments are suspected.

Occipitomental / PNS view radiograph will reveal the status of the sinus but floor of the sinus cannot be visualised. Immediately following an OAC little changes will be seen unless there is pre-existing sinusitis which is seen as opacity or a fluid level. In few instances a pre-existing cyst or neoplasm might be the cause for OAF.

In chronic OAF there is generalised mucosal thickening or opacity of sinus in PNS view.


The management consist of an early treatment for acute OAC and treatment for chronic fistula with some supportive measures.

Management of acute oro antral communication

Acute Oroantral communication is managed by socket edge reduction with simple / horizontal mattress suturing, with use of supportive pack or plate along with prophylactic use of antibiotics, antihistamines and nasal decongestants for 7 to 10 days.

Socket edge reduction and suturing

The buccal mucosa is reflected and reduction of the buccal wall of socket done by use of roungers. This allows the buccal mucoperiosteum to fall medially. It is then sutured in place with palatal side by horizontal mattress suturing.

Use of supportive packs or protective plate

Supportive packs or plate result in healing by secondary intention. Use of hemostatic packs ( Surgicel, gelfoam ) are to be avoided. Supportive packs soaked in antiseptic agent like Bismuth-Iodoform-paraffin paste (BIPP) is suspended across the socket and sutured in place. They are kept for 2 weeks. Protective plate kept for a limited period prevents the food particles from being forced in through the socket.

All these procedures should be accompanied by restriction in nose blowing to avoid raise in air pressure in the antrum so as to protect the clot until healing is complete.

It is better to put these patients on antibiotics like penicillins, antihistamines and nasal decongestants for 7 to 10 days to prevent infection.

The majority of the patients treated in this manner will have uneventful healing of OAC if they do not have pre-existing sinusitis.

Management of chronic / established fistulas or Large OAC

Oroantral communication of long duration will expose the sinus to salivary secretions and food debris. This will result in chronic irritation changes in the lining, produce infection and disturb ciliary function. So early closure of these communications are vital.

There are certain contraindications to immediate surgical closure for OAC.

  1. Degree of soft tissue damage following extraction. Macerated and oedematous adjoining oral tissue prevents early closure and it is better to leave the fistula for 3 to 4 weeks. In cases of minimal trauma to the mucoperiosteum, closure can be performed after 48 hrs.
  2. Infection in antrum. A clean sinus with healthy antral mucosa is a prerequisite for successful closure of any Oroantral communication. Condition of the antrum can be assessed by Occipitomental ( PNS ) view radiographs which might show mucosal thickening or cavity obliteration. In cases of long standing history of sinusitis the closure should be accomplished with an intranasal antrostomy to establish drainage.

Fistulae that have been open for weeks will show hyperplastic polypoidal changes in the antrum and metaplastic changes to squamous epithelium. This can be treated by local removal of sinus lining at the time of attempted closure.

In case of  sinusitis, the fistula is managed conservatively and delayed closure is done. Conservative treatment consists of daily antral lavage through the socket. The socket may be enlarged for this purpose. Over 4-6 weeks the infection should subside and spontaneous closure might occur.

Surgical closure of Oroantral fistula

In cases of healthy antrum and small fistula, closure is usually spontaneous. However in large defects surgical closure is required. Many authors have described various surgical techniques, starting with Durham in 1893 who advocated vascularised soft tissue pedicle flap for closure of these defects. Other procedures carried out include sliding buccal flaps with or without bone grafts, palatal pedicle flaps and combination of buccal and palatal flaps. Allograft such as gold foil, titanium foil, gold plate, tantalum plate, Gore-tex membrane, Hydroxyapatite block and soft methyl methacrylate have been used.

Surgical procedures carried out can be classified into

Surgical closure of Oroantral fistula

  1. Local flaps
  2. Buccal flaps
  • Advancement flap (Welty, Von Rehrmann & Berger).
  • Modified advancement (Laskin & Robinson)
  • Sliding flap (Moczair)
  1. Palatal flaps
  • Straight advancement
  • Rotational advancement
  • Hinging and Island flaps
  • Palatal submucosal connective tissue flap.
  1. Bridge flap
  2. Combined local flaps
  • Double flap
  1. Distant flaps
  2. Tongue flaps
  • Anteriorly based
  • Posteriorly based
  • Laterally based
  1. Temporalis muscle flap
  2. Buccal fat pad flap
  3. Osteoperiosteal flap
  4. Grafts
  5. Autogenous bone grafts
  6. Allografts
  • Gold foil.
  • Tantulum foil
  • Gold plate
  • Poly methyl methacrylate
  • Hydroxy apatite blocks.
  • Fibrin glue.


Various flap have been used  for closure of oroantral fistula. The basic requirement of flaps are

  1. The flap should not only cover the fistula but also a ledge of bone which will support the suture line.
  2. The flap should have a good blood supply and should be handled gently and not grasped or crushed with dissecting forceps.
  3. The flap should be sutured without tension.
  4. The flap is to be sutured only after achieving complete hemostasis, as haematoma creates tension, delays healing and also acts as a nidus for infection.

Failures occur when there are neglected and also for anatomic reasons.

Buccal Flaps

Many small defects can be closed by means of buccal mucoperiosteal flaps. Two types of buccal flaps have been used

  1. Advancement flap
  2. Sliding flap
Buccal advancement flap

This is the most commonly used buccal flap. It was first described by Welty (1920) and Von Rehrmann (1936) and popularised by Berger (1939).

This flap is used to close

  1. An established Oroantral fistula.
  2. A newly created Oroantral communication at the time of extraction.
  3. An Oroantral fistula in combination with exploration of maxillary sinus to remove displaced root.

This can be performed under local anaesthesia.

The tissue that form the rim of the fistula is excised from the edge of the opening with a No:11 BP blade exposing the rim of bone which acts as a supporting shelf for the flap. The palatal margin is undermined for 2 to 3 mm to ease suturing.

From the extreme end of buccal aspect two diagonal incisions are made through buccal mucoperiosteum. The incisions are carried into upper mucobuccal fold in a curvilinear manner. The flap is raised exposing the bonny defect. On the under surface of the flap the periosteum is incised horizontally at different levels. Care is taken not to disrupt the vascularity. This aids in stretching /extending the flap over the defect. The corners are trimmed and the flap is sutured in place. Two plain sutures are given at the medial and distal angles of the flap. A horizontal mattress is given in between them to evert wound margin and ensure a broad area of apposition of tissues. The flap should be sutured without tension or ischaemic margin, which will cause necrosis and failure in healing. Sutures are placed along the buccal limits of incision.

Ideally 4-o absorbable sutures are used but in cases where non-absorbable black silk or prolene are used it should not be removed before 10 days.

If gingival margins are included, it should be wide enough to form a everted margin on the adjacent tooth. In cases where there is no adjacent teeth the mesial and distal mucosa can be removed so that flaps rests on a distinct shelf of bone.


It has the advantage of a broad base so providing a good blood supply. There is no denuded area left behind and also no requirement for rotation. Simultaneous Caldwell – Luc procedure can be performed either directly or by extending the incision anteriorly into canine fossa.


This procedure is usually associated with reduction of buccal vestibule. Von Wowern (1972) pointed that sulcus reduction gets minimised by 6 months as the buccal sulcus reshapes in 4 to 8 weeks.


Laskin and Robinson (1956) described a modification of the buccal flap that provides a surface to surface approximation and thus assures closure even if a portion of the flap devitalises. Here instead of removing the entire mucoperiosteum on the palatal side, only the epithelium is removed. The tissue lining the fistula are not removed as this enlarges the opening. By this way, a box like preparation lined with fresh connective tissue extending on to the palatal side of the alveolar process for at least 5mm beyond the edge of the opening is created and the flap is placed onto this area.

Another modification is the use of buccal fat pad advancement along with this flap. This is accomplished surgical manoeuvre with no obvious advantages.

Buccal sliding flap

This trapezoidal sliding buccal flap to close Oroantral fistula was described by Moczair in 1930. This produces minimal change in the depth of the buccal vestibule. The distal shift if the flap is fabricated by incising the periosteum at the base of the flap. This flap is suitable in edentulous condition.

The disadvantages of this flap being a raw area is left anteriorly or posterioly and large amount of gingival attachment is needed to facilitate the shift, which might result in gingival recession and periodontal disease.

Palatal Flaps

The palatal flaps used for OAF closure are

  1. Straight advancement flap.
  2. Rotation advancement flap.
  3. Hinged and island palatal flaps based on the greater palatine vessels.
  4. Palatal submucosal connective tissue flap.

The advantages of palatal flaps are its vasculature and its thickness which resembles attached gingiva on the crest of ridge.

The disadvantages are the need for rotation with attendant risk of decreasing the blood supply and the raw donor surface that has to heal secondarily.

Palatal straight advancement flap.

This flap is of limited use due to inelastic nature of the palatal tissue reduces its lateral mobilisation. Sop it is preferable to use rotation advancement flap.

Palatal rotational advancement flap

This flap is based on the greater palatine artery. This was described by Dunning (1925) and Ashey (1939).

  1. When the oroantral fistula is related to the palatal side of the ridge.
  2. When buccal procedures have failed usually because of considerable ridge resorption.

The palatal mucosal tissue is firmly adherent to the underlying periosteum from which separation is difficult. This makes palatal flap thick and inelastic so that it must be made longer than would appear unnecessary. Only limited rotation can be performed without twisting the palatine artery. It is not recommended for areas posterior to second molar as this would devitalise the flap due to twisting of the artery. This flap can be used to close contralateral oroantral fistula/ communication posterior to second molars.


The procedure involves dissecting out fistula to expose 4mm of bone all around the defect. The palatal margin is made to coincide with lateral edge of palatal flap.

The incision for the flap is made along the midpalatal line just anterior to junction of hard and soft palate anteriorly and curved laterally back towards the affected side in the canine region. The incision is continued backwards by about 4mm behind the distal end of the fistula. The flap is lifted and detached from the palate antero-posteriorly until it can be sutured laterally over the fistula without tension.

The denuded bone anteriorly is covered with gauze soaked in antiseptic solution. Sutures are retained for a period of 10 days and pack for 3 weeks. The palatal surface regains its normal appearance in 2 months.

Kruger has suggested a ‘V’ shaped excision of tissue on the lesser curvature to minimise folding the flap. Care has to be taken to avoid damage to greater palatine vessels.

Palatal island flap.

Here an island of palatal mucosa along with greater palatine artery is dissected out and it is used to close the defect. This was first described by Brosch (1950). Millard (1962), Moore & Chong (1967) described a modification where the greater palatine neurovascular bundle is dissected till the foramen using Mc Indoe scissors. This provides some extension to the flap. Twisting is very much reduced by virtue of its length but care with manipulation of the vascular bundle should not be compromised ( Henderson, 1974 ).

James has suggested that sectioning of the island flap to be done last so that the tissue can still be used as a rotational advancement flap or returned to its original site should there be injury to the vessel during the preparation of the flap.

Gullane and Arena have described a modification of the island flap that obtains approximately 1cm of extra length by freeing the vessel at the greater palatine foramen.

Hinged flap

The mucoperiosteum on the palatal aspect of the OAF can be used as a hinged flap to close small openings. The proximity of the distal edge of the flap to the palatal vessels limits its length, therefore it cannot be used unless the opening is on the palatal side of the alveolar ridge.

Palatal submucosal connective tissue flap

This was described by Ito & Hara (1980). Here after elevation of the full thickness palatal flap, a submucosal connective tissue with artery and periosteum is used to close the fistula and return the remainder tissue to close the donor site.

Although this procedure eliminates the donor site defect, dissection of the submucosal flap is often difficult and requires great care to avoid injury to the palatal vessels that supply the flap.

Bridge Flap / Buccopalatal flap.

This is useful in cases of edentulous maxilla (Kazanjian 1949, Schuchardt 1953 ) . Here a local bridge of tissue in an area adjacent to fistula may be moved to cover it. After excision of fistulous tract incisions are placed transversely across the line of the arch. The length of the bridge of mucoperiosteum is limited on the palatal end by the palatine artery. It can be extended buccally sufficient to elevate and lift it over the fistula without tension. It is then sutured to the undisturbed edge of the mucoperiosteum on the distal edge of the defect. The bridge must be wider than the defect and broad enough to be well seated on bone. Size of the fistula must be assessed prior to incision for bridge is made. The denuded bone of the donor area will granulate and heal secondarily. There is no reduction in buccal vestibular depth.

Combined local flaps.

Closing larger defects with single local flaps have led to failures and for these situations double layered closures have been used. These include a

  1. Combination of inversion and rotational advancement flaps.
  2. Double overlapping hinge flaps.
  3. Double island flaps.
  4. Superimposed reverse palatal and buccal flaps.

All these procedures except that described by Ziemba (Superimposed reverse palatal and buccal flaps) preserve the buccal vestibule depth. The use of two donor sites results in an increased surgical time and a larger denuded area.


The limited size of local flaps make it difficult to close large fistulas, therefore distant flaps have been used for this purpose. In the past flaps from the extremities and forehead have been used. All these nave been replaced by Tongue flaps, Temporalis flap and buccal fat pad flap.

Tongue flap.

The tongue is an excellent donor site for oral soft tissue reconstruction because of its abundant vascularity. In 1956 Klopp and Schurter described the use of a lateral tongue flap for repair of a soft palatal defect secondary to surgical excision of a malignancy. In 1964 Guerrrero Santos et al used tongue flaps for lip reconstruction. Golden and colleagues (1976), Siegel associates (1977) and Carlesso et al (1980) have demonstrated the safety and success of tongue flaps for reconstruction of palatal defects. Masseng et al (1970) have found no adverse effect due to the use of pedicle tongue flaps for reconstruction of lip and palatal defects on speech articulation or tongue function. Lore et al described a posteriorly based tongue flap to line hypopharynx after total laryngectomy.

Although these flaps can be taken from the dorsum or the lateral border, the lateral border flaps are ideal because of their proximity to the fistula. The tongue flaps used for OAF closure might be Antreriorly based or Posteriorly based. These procedures are usually done under General Anaesthesia.

Dorsal pedicle tongue flap.

About 2/3rd of the width of the tongue can be utilised (2 cm ).

The length of the flap is designed in such a way that 1-2 cm of additional tissue would span the posterior edge of the palatal defect. The width of the flap may be dictated by the width of the flap plus 20%. It is mucocutaneous flap and includes about 2mm of the muscle for adequate vascularity. The flap is then elevated, rotated forward and sutured to the raw edges of the defect anteriorly and laterally. The defect on the tongue may be closed primarily with vertical mattress sutures. At two weeks the flap may be divided under local anaesthesia and set into the posterior aspect of palatal defect. During the post operative period the patient is given liquid diet in the first 24 hours and advanced slowly to amore solid diet..

The anteriorly based tongue flap has the disadvantages of tethering the mobile tongue during healing, but this does not occur with a posteriorly based flap.

Advantages of tongue flap.
  1. This is a highly vascularised flap.
  2. This has a broad based pedicle.
  3. This flap is extremely pliable.
  4. This flap can be easily placed free of tension on most areas of the hard and soft palate.

Thus the pedicled tongue flap is indicated in cases where oroantral fistula cannot be closed with local buccal or palatal flaps because of size or position.

Temporalis muscle flap.

This is another distant flap, which can be used for closure of defects in orofacial region. The temporalis muscle flap has been indicated for one stage closure of large oroantral communications for

  1. The proximity of the temporalis muscle to the oral cavity.
  2. The safety of its vascular pedicle.
  3. Its pliability.
  4. The minimal functional and aesthetic sequelae.

The muscle is approached through a hemicoronal incision, the flap is outlined and the temporalis fascia is sectioned above the arch to permit flap rotation. It is then brought into the oral cavity through a tunnel created in the infra temporal fossa. This can be facilitated by removing a section of zygomatic arch, which is replaced and fixed with miniplate after the passage of the flap. When necessary the coronoid process is sectioned to increase the arc of rotation and the length of the flap.


This flap has the advantage over the tongue flap of causing less dysfunction during the healing period and providing the ability to close larger defects. Epithelisation occurs in 2 to 3 weeks.

Buccal fat pad

The buccal fat pad ( BFP) is a mass of specialised fatty tissue distinct from subcutaneous fat. This tissue was first recognised by Bichat in 1802. The BFP is located between the buccinator muscle and the mandibular ramus, separating the masticatory muscles from each other. It is surrounded by a fascial envelope. In the infants this prevents indrawing of the cheeks during suckling and in the adult it enhance the intermuscular motion.

The use of buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft for closure of oroantral communication was first described by Egyedi 1977 with split skin graft cover. Its use as a free graft was reported by Neder 1983. Fideman et al 1986 first described the use of uncovered BFP a s a pedicled graft in the mouth and showed that healing occurred within 2-3 weeks leaving a good mucosal surface. A large series of 56 cases of use of BFP for closure of OAF have been published by Stajcic Z. 1992.

Surgical anatomy

The buccal fat pad has a central body with four extensions. The main body lies above the parotid duct on the anterior border of the masseter muscle and extends deeply to lie on the maxilla and forward along the buccal vestibule.

The buccal extension is the most superficial and enters the cheek below the parotid duct. It descends to the mandibular retromolar region and overlies the main part of the buccinator muscle.

The pterygoid extension passes down and back to lie on the lateral surfaces of the pterygoid plates.

The temporal extension passes upward below the zygomatic arch and comprises a deep and superficial portion. The deep part lies on the temporalis muscle, tendon and It separates it from the zygomatic arch.

The blood supply of the BFP is from the buccal and deep temporal branches of the maxillary artery, the superficial temporal artery through the transverse fascial branch and small branches of the fascial artery.

The body and buccal extension (50% of total volume) are accessible through the mouth and available as a pedicled graft. It is readily accessible through an horizontal vestibular incision in the third molar region. The fat pad is then gently teased out of its bed and advanced into the defect, where it is sutured in place. It can be left as such or covered with buccal flap, split skin or lyophilised porcine dermis. Uncovered fat pad epithelises in 2 – 3 weeks.

  1. This has got rich vascular supply.
  2. Ease of access and close proximity of the donor site to the defect.
  3. Reliable method for the reconstruction of defects up to 4cm in diameter, on the ipsilateral side of the soft palate and posterior alveolar region of the maxilla. Histology of healed tissue showed epithelialisation to 6 – 8 mm with no fat cells.

Osteoperiosteal flap

An osteoperiosteal flap with a posteriorly located pedicle may be rotated downward beneath the usual vestibular mucoperiosteal flap and the fistulae may be closed. Its use was first described by Abello, Apumoa, Boateng and Mela.

  1. This reconstructs bone with bone and mucosa with mucosa.
  2. Reduces the failure rate of repair.
  3. Reduces the post-operative alveolar bone and vestibular atrophy.
  4. Results in osseous closure of fistula.

This is a prolonged procedure.


After the vestibular mucoperiosteal flap has been raised to the tooth apices, the periosteum is cut horizontally to permit further flap elevation. The dissection proceeds superiorly to expose the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus covered with periosteum. The area is localised to make an operculum and the periosteum is incised in a U shape with the arms directed posteriorly and diverging to widen the base of the flap. With a fine bur the bony wall of the sinus is cut superiorly, anteriorly and inferiorly. The bony flap is then levered with a periosteal elevator and remaining posterior one fourth of its circumference is fractured. The periosteal pedicle is gently elevated from the maxillary surface posteriorly and the bony flap is brought down to the level of alveolar process to cover the fistula. The bone flap is shaped with rounger to the dimension of the fistula and sutured. The vestibular mucoperiosteal flap is then sutured.


Various grafts autogenous and alloplasts have been tried along with local or distant flaps for closure of oroantral fistula.

Bone grafts

The use of autogenous bone grafts has been recommended by some authors as an aid in the closure of oroantral fistula. The antral surface of the graft is covered by means of gingival tissue from the adjacent site to the fistula and the oral surface is covered by means of buccal, palatal or tongue flaps. Vuillemin et al have advocated the use of buccal fat pad along with bone grafts for isolating bone grafts from the sinus and the oral mucosa in case of large defects. The use of bone grafts provides rigid contour for support to prosthesis.

Alloplastic materials

A variety of alloplastic and allogenic materialhave been used to close oroantral fistulae. The alloplastic material used include

  • Gold foil
  • Tantulum
  • Gold plate
  • Polymethacrylate
  • Hydroxyapatite blocks
  • Fibrin glue
Gold Foil technique

This has been popularised in the USA by Crolius 1956 and Meyerhoff et al 1973. It is a conservative measure.

  • It requires minimal surgical procedure.
  • It can be done under local anaesthesia.
  • It preserves the full depth of the sulcus.
  • It is primarily advocated for the management of very large fistulae.
  • In cases of failed flaps from local or other sites.
  • As an immediate simple trouble free protection of the sinus.

This procedure has to be considered only in cases of healthy maxillary sinus.


The fistulous tract is excised or curreted to take away the epithelium lining and bringing the underlying defect into view where any diseased bone is removed. A linear incision is made on the crest of alveolar ridge which is extended 1.5cm anteriorly and posteriorly to the defect. The mucoperiosteum is raised exposing about 5mm of bone surrounding the defect.

A small oblong piece of gold foil 24carat of 35gauge is placed over the defect and surrounding bone. It should have a overlap of 3mm that can be tucked under the mucosal wound to prevent dislodgement. The incision is then closed with interrupted sutures. No attempt is made to appose the tissues but leaving an elliptical defect which will expose the gold foil through out the healing period. Granulation tissue grows from around the wound edges on the superior antral surface of the inert gold foil and crosses it to form a bridge. This is said to be complete in most patients in 3-6 months.

The sutures are removed after 10 days. As healing progresses the edges of the oral wound recedes progressively to expose the gold foil which in time can be removed with little difficulty. The oral surface then gradually epithelises.


The healing above the gold foil cannot be seen and conventional repair may be needed later.

Originally Tantulum plate was used instead of gold foil, while some prefer silastic, Teflon sheet, but gold seems easy to handle.

Stajcic et al described the use of fibrin glue to close small oroantral communications that were recognised at the time of extraction. Here the material is injected into the socket from its depth.

Supportive measures

During the initial healing period, the patients must be advised to avoid movements which stretch the cheek or more blowing activities or forceful mouth rinsing which produces difference between the two sides of the wound.

These patients are put on a course of antibiotics like amoxycillin 500mg 8th hourly to prevent infection.

Patient is advised to do steam inhalation with benzoin or menthol 6th hourly for this moistens the airway and facilitates serous secretion and clears the sinus.

In cases of chronic sinusitis an intranasal antrostomy may be done along with OAF closure to provide drainage to maxillary sinus or it might be combined with a Caldwell-Luc procedure to clear the sinus lining with antrostomy. A simple method for establishing an intranasal antrostomy is to pass heavy curved artery forceps into the floor and laterally into the antrum below the inferior turbinate. A length of ½ inch ribbon gauze can be inserted into the antrum and pulled back to create a smooth margined defect in the medial antral wall. A tubular drain is placed for 24 hours.


Perforation of the maxillary sinus during dentoalveolar surgery is relatively common occurrence. Most of these communications close spontaneously if the sinus is healthy. However, the presence of pre-existing sinus, infection or introduction of a foreign body through the opening can lead to the formation of an Oroantral fistula. The successful management of such cases depends on elimination of infection, removal of the foreign body when present and closure of the fistula with a well vascularised flap that is not under tension and that places suture line on solid bone. There are many procedures, which fulfil these criteria and it would be better to choose simplest method that suits the clinical condition.


  1. Killey & Kay – outline of oral surgery. Part I
  2. Gustav Kruger – Textbook of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery.
  3. Moore – Surgery of the mouth and Jaws.
  4. Daniel M. Laskin – Management of Oroantral Fistula and other sinus related complications. Oral & Maxillofacial clinics of North America.1:11:Feb1999.
  5. Roberto Brusati – Use of an Osteoperiosteal flap to close oroantral fistulas. J. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, April 1982.
  6. Samman, H. Tidemann – the buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction. International J. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 1992.
  7. Timothy S Thomas – Closure of palatal defect using dorsal pedicle tongue flap. J. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Oct 1982.